buzz forums

The latency on the newer build seems better. Thanks to the developers for theer ongoing work! I could load simpler songs but when trying to load my more buffed one, I got this: --------------------------- Modern Pattern Editor.NET --------------------------- Object reference not set to an instance o...

anyway, i think its much too early for performance comparisons. Agree, just wanted to highlight this as my hope is also that the developer maybe read this thread. Maybe it's something that can be easily fixed by changing build flags or audio settings when they are available? I have no idea, but I'm...

I am using Windows 11 on a laptop with i-7 10875H CPU. I am attaching 2 screenshots of CPU meter after loading my song. This one is from the Buzz 64 bit from 21-Mar-2023 S1.png The next one is from ReBuzz. Somehow, the VSTs on ReBuzz are taking much more CPU even without playback being in progress. ...

I tested the new version 01-Mar-2024 today. Finally the mute marker works and I could start playing some of my songs. Few issues I currently have: 1. The VST loading seems to have slowed down, especially the "Init machine" step. It takes several times longer to load a song that uses VSTs h...

The new version that was recently released, detects VST3. One thing that's missing for me to have a proper playback of my buzz tracks is support for mute marker. Fingers crossed.

Hi, lately, when trying to check whether a new version of BuzzSetup_x64_2022_Edition.exe, I also found that the website https://buzz.robotplanet.dk/ hosts a "very early stage .NET rewrite: ReBuzzSetup_2023_Edition.exe (19-Nov-2023)". I like this idea because it can be a breath of fresh air...