buzz forums

Freebase is just a renamed kick drum synth

flat wrote:fuzzpilz rosengarten, is broken for new buzz

That's been broken on mine since forever.... I can get it to load like 1 in 30 times, the rest of the time it just locks up Buzz

Found out the source of the problem / bug - because the resolution of my screen is so high (1920 x 1080 - the recommended resolution according to my graphics card) the text is a little too small for my vision so I put the text size of my screen to 125% (Control Panel > All Control Panel Items > Disp...

Ooh, have you got an example of one so I can try when I get home from work ?

ags wrote:I notice your taskbar is not usual w7

Erm, yes it is ?! No custom theming whatsoever

(I have an application dock at the bottom if that's what you mean ?)

Yeah and I believe it rendered it correctly on my old machine too. So the question is - why on earth on this (pretty much completely) fresh Win7 64-bit build (though 32bit version of Buzz), is it going wonky - and just with this menu box

I'm not sure quite if it's my graphics card (NVIDEA GeForce 540M) but I've noticed a strange phenomenon that I really don't remember happening on my old laptop - The distance (both X & Y) from the mouse pointer to the text box (the one that appears when you type on the Machine View) seems to cha...

Woah nice - thanks for the link man

Aah glad it's not just me - I was starting to think my Buzz just didn't like my new laptop. I've begun to use the two ASIO outs now as I'm starting to learn surround sound composition, I use one ASIO machine for the front two channels and another for the back two - not sure if there's a better way o...

Is this possibly related to this issue that Joachip raised - viewtopic.php?f=2&t=997

Maybe it has something to do with 64bit or different processors? I'm on a AMD 64bit running win7 64, running buzz 32bit Mmm possibly, I'm on an Intel i7 (Sandy bridge) 64bit running Windows 7 (with 32 bit Buzz). Should I be running the Buzz AVX builds, or is/was this just for test purposes by Oskar...

Weird th0ke is able to get the burst with the example too ( http://forums.jeskola.net/viewtopic.php?p=3561#p3561 - N.B. He got the two example files I uploaded mixed up, so that's why he refers to not being able to see a matilde). N.B. Sometimes it takes about 20 seconds to happen, sometimes it's in...

I believe msvcp60.dll is also needed for some machines ...

Cool, cheers for confirming man - the nearest I'd describe it as is being a buffer underrun, like the samples are struggling to get there quite in time so you get this metallic sound. Edit - looks like you went through exactly the deduction process I went through last night :D Try disabling the mult...

Crap, sorry man I uploaded the wrong bmx last night - that one was meant for this post: viewtopic.php?p=2970#p2970 (glad you also confirm a noise burst, as that was the reason for the upload - in that topic anyway !)

Originally I did - first the philthy then raverb, then both (I first posted those being at fault before editing, then re-editing, then re-re-editing ! ) as I also thought that those were more likely to be the fault. But it wasn't until I disabled multithreading on Matilde that the problem went when ...

Weird, I don't get a burst just a crackly/robot-y noise when the second Matilde is connected. What happens if you manually create the chain - Matilde Tracker 1.9rc7 (aka Matilde Tracker 2) -> FSM Philthy -> Jeskola Raverb -> Master and then connect a second MTrk 2 to the Philthy? - another burst ?

had the same issue with drumatic 3 too. disabling multithreading for this vst solved the issue most of the time. however, when loading a bmx containing the machine the issue came up again. i found only one workaround: 1) create a second instance of drumatic in the same bmx 2) save and reload the pr...

Can anyone else confirm this: Matilde Tracker 2 (more specifically 1.9rc7) -> FSM Philthy -> Jeskola Raverb -> Master Try then connecting a second Matilde Tracker 2 into the Philthy and the sound should go all crunchy (example bmx - http://www.ilovecubus.co.uk/pete/buzz_multithreading.bmx - hit play...

So would it follow that (in rather simplistic coding terms) a possible check could be something along the lines of: if ((output != 0) && (buzz VU meter == 0)){noiseburst handler}

Or again would such a routine be completely impracticable?