buzz forums

forums of the buzz
It is currently Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:18 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2017 12:33 am 

Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:52 am
Posts: 7
If this is a stupid question, please forgive my ignorance.

When mixing and exporting, I usually run everything into the Master machine, or the JedShiva Meter then the Master. Lately I've been considering changing over to some sort of mixer, whether it's native Buzz or VST doesn't matter, but my question is, would it really make any significant difference in sound or quality? And if so, which one should I be using??

Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2017 1:52 pm 

Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:36 am
Posts: 28
I tend to start off with everything going to Master if playing around. Once it gets a bit further I use mixIO.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2017 5:02 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 5:22 pm
Posts: 455
Location: France
Yeah, Mixio is an excellent Mixing tool with a very nice gui.
It doesnt affect sound if you dont tweak it :)
If you dont have it it's here :
http://buzz.robotplanet.dk/machineinfo.php?id=8171


Attachments:
mixio.jpg
mixio.jpg [ 268.17 KiB | Viewed 1300 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2017 12:24 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:54 pm
Posts: 116
Location: Faraway but near enough
Quote:
would it really make any significant difference in sound or quality?


Yep! If u use the very cpu and resource-friendly ld-mixer. LD-Mixer is like a classic mixing console. You can ad tracks, pan the instruments, eq the low-mid-high freqs, so you can finally dig deep into the mix ...
You can also do all this things without the mixer too, but it isn't that comfortable - imo ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 7:49 pm 

Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:52 am
Posts: 7
Thanks for the input guys. I suppose I should re-phrase my question slightly though... Assuming that I already have all the panning, eq, levels, etc. taken care of by other machines, is there much of a difference in the way the Master machine sums all of the audio signals, compared to a mixer?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 12:44 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:54 pm
Posts: 116
Location: Faraway but near enough
Quote:
is there much of a difference in the way the Master machine sums all of the audio signals, compared to a mixer?


No ... :mrgreen: ... ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 2:06 am 

Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:52 am
Posts: 7
Awesome! Makes my life much easier. Perhaps in future projects I'll get some mixers involved. Thanks, rock on dudes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 10, 2017 3:46 pm 

Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 am
Posts: 381
My routing is everything goes into mixio, then I split to channels out for the sgorpi multitrack writer, and then put it through the mastering chain. Sometimes I use 2-3 mixio's per song.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 7:12 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 7:15 pm
Posts: 30
Location: Göteborg / Sweden
actually i usually just rout everything into a do-nothing. I do all my channel-modifing and such with different VST EQ:s and compressors...

maybe it is not as nice graphically but when the jeskola mixer stopped working in nu-buzz i just figured i didn't like any other of the mixers as much...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group