Graphic EQ

User avatar
bigyo
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 2:29 pm
Contact:

Graphic EQ

Post by bigyo »

Last edited by bigyo on Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Evelon
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:00 pm

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by Evelon »

Thank you!
User avatar
magmavander
Posts: 688
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 5:22 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by magmavander »

Yes!! Thanks for these EQ machines.
I will use them soon to see if there's bugs (that I dont believe, I've never had problems with your machines he he he).
Why do you call it 'Graphic' ?
You came back here with gifts ;)
User avatar
UNZ
Posts: 809
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 9:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by UNZ »

magmavander wrote: Why do you call it 'Graphic' ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphic_eq ... _equalizer
User avatar
magmavander
Posts: 688
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 5:22 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by magmavander »

Thanks :mrgreen:
User avatar
strobotone
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:59 pm
Location: berlin
Contact:

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by strobotone »

they "sound" ok as far as i can tell. :)
most of the time i use parametric EQs but i find your 20 band graphic EQ handy and use it when i want an high resolution eq and dont wanna fiddle with bandwidths. it does a good job when you want to lower some resonant frequencies.
User avatar
xlorite
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 1:30 pm
Location: Newcastle
Contact:

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by xlorite »

i use only vst eqs but good to see a brand new machine for buzz ;)
elekt
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:29 pm

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by elekt »

:D very nice.
User avatar
tinga
Posts: 526
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 5:25 pm

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by tinga »

Attributes:dB range 8 to 32, Bandwidth 0.1 to 2 oct.
Cpu 0.5% to 1.5% on my computer, many thx for this cool stuff :D
User avatar
Evelon
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:00 pm

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by Evelon »

tinga wrote:Attributes:dB range 8 to 32, Bandwidth 0.1 to 2 oct.
Cpu 0.5% to 1.5% on my computer, many thx for this cool stuff :D
Ah! These could, IMHO, be made available as machine parameters (if possible that is).
User avatar
bigyo
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 2:29 pm
Contact:

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by bigyo »

Thanks for feedback.
Evelon wrote:
tinga wrote:Attributes:dB range 8 to 32, Bandwidth 0.1 to 2 oct.
Cpu 0.5% to 1.5% on my computer, many thx for this cool stuff :D
Ah! These could, IMHO, be made available as machine parameters (if possible that is).
yes, this is possible, i'll change it.

there is one thing i didn't realize. most equalizers i've checked define bandwidth to be the frequency difference between the points that are 3 dB below the peak.
in this machine bandwidth is defined between points that are half gain below the peak (i.e. if gain is 10dB bandwidth is defined between points 5dB below the peak)
and i think this is better.
This has been described in this article http://thesounddesign.com/MIO/EQ-Coefficients.pdf
User avatar
bigyo
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 2:29 pm
Contact:

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by bigyo »

updated
User avatar
strobotone
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:59 pm
Location: berlin
Contact:

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by strobotone »

nice. what i also have a use for is a wet/dry slider. i often find myself using a crossfader to mix wet and dry signals.
User avatar
Evelon
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:00 pm

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by Evelon »

Thank you, Bigyo!

edit: the zip seems to be damaged here.
User avatar
bigyo
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 2:29 pm
Contact:

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by bigyo »

i think wet/dry is not a good idea for EQ, since it has non-linear phase

uploaded the zip again, it should be ok now: http://bigyo.untergrund.net/buzz/bigyo_eq_v10.zip
User avatar
Evelon
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:00 pm

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by Evelon »

Much appreciated!
User avatar
magmavander
Posts: 688
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 5:22 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by magmavander »

Thanks for these eq. I used it in still all my works now.
They are stable, they dont eat all my cpu 8-)
Merci!!
User avatar
Buzztler
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:54 pm
Location: Faraway but near enough

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by Buzztler »

Just wanted to say ... many, many thanks for these awesome eq's Bigyo ...

I tested the 31-band EQ in the effect chain of the bass in my latest track and I think it is really good working, with low cpu consumption and the two sliders on top of the parameter-window are very, very useful ... :D
Why don't you upload them to the buzzmachines dot com page?
Dean
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 6:11 pm

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by Dean »

bigup for bigyo!
another great machine for the collection!
User avatar
bigyo
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 2:29 pm
Contact:

Re: Graphic EQ

Post by bigyo »

i made one small change: range parameter is now 0 - 32 dB. i will upload it (and updated ParamEQ) to buzzmachines today
Post Reply