youtube disagrees

Post Reply
User avatar
szaszhareen
Posts: 527
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 1:15 am
Location: deep beneath the earths crust

youtube disagrees

Post by szaszhareen »

Image

Image

:lol:

not surprisingly there are absolutely no jeskola buzz dubstep results, but apparently people are looking for them enough to convince youtube's suggestion algo to include it. zwtf
User avatar
Evelon
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:00 pm

Re: youtube disagrees

Post by Evelon »

Lol!
Shit, Oskari. What have you started?! :P
mridlen
Posts: 432
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 am
Contact:

Re: youtube disagrees

Post by mridlen »

I suspect it was from too many emails asking if Buzz could make PHAT DUBSTEP BEATZ
User avatar
szaszhareen
Posts: 527
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 1:15 am
Location: deep beneath the earths crust

Re: youtube disagrees

Post by szaszhareen »

www.dubstepforum.com wrote:I can haz teh buzz wobblz?
:lol:
dukajoe
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:33 am

Re: youtube disagrees

Post by dukajoe »

What's wrong with dubstep? 8-)
double07
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 6:17 am
Location: Australia

Re: youtube disagrees

Post by double07 »

dukajoe wrote:What's wrong with dubstep? 8-)
Nothing wrong with dubstep... brostep on the other hand: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brostep#Br ... velopments
User avatar
thOke
Posts: 343
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 7:14 am

Re: youtube disagrees

Post by thOke »

User avatar
vacuum
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 10:24 am

Re: youtube disagrees

Post by vacuum »

I don't understand...
Is the "no dubstep" thing a sort of anti-newbie feature so they will not ask how to squeez 5 ticks into 3 ticks, and such ??
I just tried to make dubstep loop and it's just a frequency modulation trick, as far as I can see. :shock:
... or shouldn't I reveal that ? :|
User avatar
mantratronic
Posts: 296
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:23 pm

Re: youtube disagrees

Post by mantratronic »

It's about someone not liking dubstep... Or just the wobwobwobwob bass maybe.
User avatar
vacuum
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 10:24 am

Re: youtube disagrees

Post by vacuum »

Hmm.. , the most dubstep that I hear in the commercial media (if not all) is the annoying type of dubstep to me too.
I like the Mr Oizo Flat Beat type of wobwob bass though, and now I know how to make it, :D
User avatar
mcbpete
Posts: 381
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 9:45 pm

Re: youtube disagrees

Post by mcbpete »

The dubstep on TV and the mainstream (and what people generally say nowadays is dubstep) isn't dubstep, it's brostep. This is what dubstep is meant to sound like - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cOC2NcbADM
User avatar
mantratronic
Posts: 296
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:23 pm

Re: youtube disagrees

Post by mantratronic »

mcbpete wrote:The dubstep on TV and the mainstream (and what people generally say nowadays is dubstep) isn't dubstep, it's brostep. This is what dubstep is meant to sound like - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cOC2NcbADM
I love that track, and burial etc, but it's quite hard to find anything like it being made recently. The last time I went looking for that sort of oldschool stuff i heard 20+ tracks of what you call brostep and gave up. Any suggestions on how to separate them in searches?
mridlen
Posts: 432
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 am
Contact:

Re: youtube disagrees

Post by mridlen »

vacuum wrote:I don't understand...
Is the "no dubstep" thing a sort of anti-newbie feature so they will not ask how to squeez 5 ticks into 3 ticks, and such ??
I just tried to make dubstep loop and it's just a frequency modulation trick, as far as I can see. :shock:
... or shouldn't I reveal that ? :|
SHHHHHHH!!!! :lol:
User avatar
vacuum
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 10:24 am

Re: youtube disagrees

Post by vacuum »

SHHHHHHH!!!! :lol:
..yes I said that half joking, because I remember a long time ago people said "the newbie-proof system works" oslt, about old buzz. :lol:

..but seriously I just realised a few days ago that if the max amplitude = 1, then multiplying 2 oscillators have also a max amp = 1,
so then I understood why I read a long time ago how you can control one osc by a low frequency osc. It just didn't come to my mind.
.. I just used to think more like multiplying larg numbers that get huge when multiplying. :ugeek:

..but the wobwobwob bass is often more complex with filters or al kinds of oscillators ofcourse... (skrillex thinks: multiplying??? wtf)
I found multiple ways to make it wobwobwob, and if we keep talking maybe the discount on discodsp will stay a little longer :mrgreen:
I saw the videos of corona on their site. It's a tweak beast. You can even load samplesbased stuff with it :!: .. hmmm...
Tiadiad
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:55 am

Re: youtube disagrees

Post by Tiadiad »

thOke wrote:"ELDERS REACT TO DUBSTEP (SKRILLEX)"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgII2gDY ... e=youtu.be

and "KIDS REACT TO DUBSTEP"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6ZD-EvW ... ure=relmfu

:geek:

My favorite is the lady who says: "I dunno exactly what emo is, but emo might have liked this kind of music."

hehhehehe


I still consider Kode 9 to be what dubstep should have been, he is brilliant! Skrillex doesn't make me feel like much, although got to give it to him, the man is hard working and driven.
Post Reply