http://www.musicradar.com/tuition/tech/ ... y-238905/9
Awkward and disappointing compared to Buzz although Reaper is not bad
In there dreams
Re: In there dreams
Though to be fair, not many folks outside these forum walls are probably even aware that Buzz has been 'rebuilt'/'redeveloped' since the version in the late 90s. I've never seen people mention it online at all ... (as I say apart from here/BuzzChurch or if I try to plug it somewhere else)
Re: In there dreams
*their
It's just a matter of taste, reference, experience, workflow, esthetics, habit, etc. I for one have used Cubase since 1995 and Buzz since 2000. They are both great, and both have their strengths/weaknesses.
"it's not what you use, but how you use/abuse it".
Meh, just thinking of this vs. that makes me tired.
It's just a matter of taste, reference, experience, workflow, esthetics, habit, etc. I for one have used Cubase since 1995 and Buzz since 2000. They are both great, and both have their strengths/weaknesses.
"it's not what you use, but how you use/abuse it".
Meh, just thinking of this vs. that makes me tired.
Re: In there dreams
If I was starting out fresh, I would probably go with Ableton since you can do some really cool things with it.
- onecircles
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 7:07 am
Re: In there dreams
yo dawg that what skrillex use? B)