buzz forums

This grey meters button should bring that window up. I could make it clearer, did you try it?

Couple more useful machines I've had Claude knock up.

Spectral analyser:
https://github.com/thepedal/pedal-spectral-buzz-1503

Stereo mastering effect:
https://github.com/thepedal/pedal-master-n-1503

I've always used Mimo's excellent MixIO but I recently found that its mute/solo controls are not exported data-wise as I need so I wondered whether my 'Pedal Gain Multi' effect could back-port from ReBuzz to Buzz. Turns out converting it from managed ReBuzz machine to native Buzz machine was trivial...

Is there an alternative to using Groove 1? I love me some swing, and I especially love that Buzz can do adjustable 8th swing and 16th swing both at the same time to create fun, wonky rhythms, so if there's a way (other than automating tempo) to do that in ReBuzz too, that would be awesome and I'd l...

Huge respect for dedicating time to adding functionality to these trackers which are still beloved by so many. I know of at least one great musician who has produced truly outstanding released music with Schism tracker from time to time.

https://bogdanraczynski.com/instruments/

Yes multi out is there! Just be aware that ReBuzz is a bit of a moving tagret right now and machines may need to be tweaked to accomodate future changes. ReBuzz now has disable machine loading in gear.xml though, if you need to strip out a machine which does not load because of changes.

My flirtation with writing managed machines for ReBuzz has consumed way too much of my spare time the last few weeks but the result is 36 and counting machines, mostly all tested for reliability with dlls (and presets sometimes) up as releases at https://github.com/thepedal?tab=repositories Attached...

I'm thinking some overhead might be reduced by the processes running directly under the ReBuzz main process rather than via the 32bit bridge. Is that naive?

Hey @george Your updated, updated version of Matilde *seems* to play better in ReBuzz than in old Buzz. I don't have empirical proof of this but my testing the improved SINC setting in old Buzz has usually had it using a lot more CPU than is really feasible whereas in ReBuzz that doesn't *seem* to b...

https://github.com/thepedal/BTDSys-PeerCtrl-ReBuzz

Managed machine rewrite of BTDSys-PeerCtrl enitrely using Claude . Took about 6 hours with various bits of testing. I'm reasonably certain it does everything it needs to but any suggestions for improvement or bugs appreciated.

Going to second this RE PeerCtrl. Something similar or that machine working would really be the key to me committing to starting to write in ReBuzz now it seems stable enough. How tricky would it be to integrate a way of writing out midi control mappings to a xml or something so I could create a map...

Huge thanks for your time, this might be a total dead end and given that it seems to be fine if you start from scratch OR just leave it on filter mode 2 then that may be how it is... I've always used the multi-out mtracker as 'Matilde Tracker3.dll' and that's what I've been copying these updates to....

Still getting the high amp clicks and pops I'm afraid, along with some erratic other crazy sounds. Let me know if there's any more specific info I can pass over.

Amazing, thanks. Will let you know later.

Yeah still not fixed sadly. Sent you a .bmx example if you want to see if you can replicate. Thanks for your work so far, it's amazing were still getting improvements to Buzz stuff even after all this time

Afraid it's only very slightly better, if at all. With filter mode 3 enabled on 3 instances of Mtrack 1.13 (about page update thanks :) ) I see in Buzz cpu monitor they all spike into the 10s of %s and the pops and clicks are fairly constant if not regular in any way if that makes sense. Will quickl...

Cheers I'll give that a bash tonight.

Ok, so it's more esoteric than I thought. If I create a new empty .bmx with an Mtrack 1.12 (about page still says 1.11 btw, no biggie) and have that controlled by a peer chord so it's playing kick drum samples through a range of notes then 'SINC 32' filter mode '3' and 'Offline SINC 512 Bounce' '1' ...

SINC 32 filter mode seems to really pop and click for me. Running on a recent laptop with an Intel Core Ultra 7 165U and a decent rme asio soundcard. Is it just way more intensive than linear/spline and I should just stick with one of those? At the moment I'm just testing trying to trigger mono drum...