buzz forums

Huge respect for dedicating time to adding functionality to these trackers which are still beloved by so many. I know of at least one great musician who has produced truly outstanding released music with Schism tracker from time to time.

https://bogdanraczynski.com/instruments/

Yes multi out is there! Just be aware that ReBuzz is a bit of a moving tagret right now and machines may need to be tweaked to accomodate future changes. ReBuzz now has disable machine loading in gear.xml though, if you need to strip out a machine which does not load because of changes.

My flirtation with writing managed machines for ReBuzz has consumed way too much of my spare time the last few weeks but the result is 36 and counting machines, mostly all tested for reliability with dlls (and presets sometimes) up as releases at https://github.com/thepedal?tab=repositories Attached...

I'm thinking some overhead might be reduced by the processes running directly under the ReBuzz main process rather than via the 32bit bridge. Is that naive?

Hey @george Your updated, updated version of Matilde *seems* to play better in ReBuzz than in old Buzz. I don't have empirical proof of this but my testing the improved SINC setting in old Buzz has usually had it using a lot more CPU than is really feasible whereas in ReBuzz that doesn't *seem* to b...

https://github.com/thepedal/BTDSys-PeerCtrl-ReBuzz

Managed machine rewrite of BTDSys-PeerCtrl enitrely using Claude . Took about 6 hours with various bits of testing. I'm reasonably certain it does everything it needs to but any suggestions for improvement or bugs appreciated.

Going to second this RE PeerCtrl. Something similar or that machine working would really be the key to me committing to starting to write in ReBuzz now it seems stable enough. How tricky would it be to integrate a way of writing out midi control mappings to a xml or something so I could create a map...

Huge thanks for your time, this might be a total dead end and given that it seems to be fine if you start from scratch OR just leave it on filter mode 2 then that may be how it is... I've always used the multi-out mtracker as 'Matilde Tracker3.dll' and that's what I've been copying these updates to....

Still getting the high amp clicks and pops I'm afraid, along with some erratic other crazy sounds. Let me know if there's any more specific info I can pass over.

Amazing, thanks. Will let you know later.

Yeah still not fixed sadly. Sent you a .bmx example if you want to see if you can replicate. Thanks for your work so far, it's amazing were still getting improvements to Buzz stuff even after all this time

Afraid it's only very slightly better, if at all. With filter mode 3 enabled on 3 instances of Mtrack 1.13 (about page update thanks :) ) I see in Buzz cpu monitor they all spike into the 10s of %s and the pops and clicks are fairly constant if not regular in any way if that makes sense. Will quickl...

Cheers I'll give that a bash tonight.

Ok, so it's more esoteric than I thought. If I create a new empty .bmx with an Mtrack 1.12 (about page still says 1.11 btw, no biggie) and have that controlled by a peer chord so it's playing kick drum samples through a range of notes then 'SINC 32' filter mode '3' and 'Offline SINC 512 Bounce' '1' ...

SINC 32 filter mode seems to really pop and click for me. Running on a recent laptop with an Intel Core Ultra 7 165U and a decent rme asio soundcard. Is it just way more intensive than linear/spline and I should just stick with one of those? At the moment I'm just testing trying to trigger mono drum...

Would be cool if you could one day get the BTD stuff over to GitHub. I tried for a while to use Claude AI to either create a modern replica of PeerCtrl or at least tinker with the bits of it that annoy me but it was a nightmare. With a mind to get it working in ReBuzz. I'm no programmer, especially ...

Did SampleGrid sources never make it up to the Sourceforge page? Is there a reason for that?

Are the changes George applied to Matilde tracker relevant to SampleGrid and possible there too? Perhaps it was written with better sample handling from the start?

viewtopic.php?p=17783

Yes. Apologies for being too lazy to check but does this just follow on from "Matilde Tracker v1.10 rc1 for Buzz" which has native multi I/O support? I seem to have Matilde Tracker.dll: Matilde Tracker v1.10 rc1 for Buzz Matilde Tracker2.dll Matilde Tracker v1.9 rc8 for Buzz Matilde Tracke...