Now it sounds like you like it the way it is! Should I prevent re-triggering the same value? I think I should.tinga wrote:Yes, it's great now, the random param works exactly according to the rate, for notes that means a total liberty for rhythm, independent of buzz BPM if we use Hz or ms, it's not the same PeerLFO, a new tool for me, a very easy to use sequencer, the duo peerlfo peerscale is very nice now.
I discover the interaction between ticks update and rate in ms in random mode, amazing, this subtick update is a killer update.
Thinking about it a bit more, it's just possible that the same random value could be chosen twice in which case it should allow the duplication. I should actually prevent it from sending a value if a new hasn't been chosen, which is slightly different.