Page 1 of 3
Graphic EQ
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:32 pm
by bigyo
Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:36 am
by Evelon
Thank you!
Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:18 pm
by magmavander
Yes!! Thanks for these EQ machines.
I will use them soon to see if there's bugs (that I dont believe, I've never had problems with your machines he he he).
Why do you call it 'Graphic' ?
You came back here with gifts

Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:47 pm
by UNZ
Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 1:11 pm
by magmavander
Thanks

Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 5:48 pm
by strobotone
they "sound" ok as far as i can tell.
most of the time i use parametric EQs but i find your 20 band graphic EQ handy and use it when i want an high resolution eq and dont wanna fiddle with bandwidths. it does a good job when you want to lower some resonant frequencies.
Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:05 pm
by xlorite
i use only vst eqs but good to see a brand new machine for buzz

Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:16 am
by elekt

very nice.
Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:31 pm
by tinga
Attributes:dB range 8 to 32, Bandwidth 0.1 to 2 oct.
Cpu 0.5% to 1.5% on my computer, many thx for this cool stuff

Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:10 am
by Evelon
tinga wrote:Attributes:dB range 8 to 32, Bandwidth 0.1 to 2 oct.
Cpu 0.5% to 1.5% on my computer, many thx for this cool stuff

Ah! These could, IMHO, be made available as machine parameters (if possible that is).
Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:00 pm
by bigyo
Thanks for feedback.
Evelon wrote:tinga wrote:Attributes:dB range 8 to 32, Bandwidth 0.1 to 2 oct.
Cpu 0.5% to 1.5% on my computer, many thx for this cool stuff

Ah! These could, IMHO, be made available as machine parameters (if possible that is).
yes, this is possible, i'll change it.
there is one thing i didn't realize. most equalizers i've checked define bandwidth to be the frequency difference between the points that are 3 dB below the peak.
in this machine bandwidth is defined between points that are half gain below the peak (i.e. if gain is 10dB bandwidth is defined between points 5dB below the peak)
and i think this is better.
This has been described in this article
http://thesounddesign.com/MIO/EQ-Coefficients.pdf
Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:10 pm
by bigyo
updated
Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:27 pm
by strobotone
nice. what i also have a use for is a wet/dry slider. i often find myself using a crossfader to mix wet and dry signals.
Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:44 pm
by Evelon
Thank you, Bigyo!
edit: the zip seems to be damaged here.
Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:08 am
by bigyo
i think wet/dry is not a good idea for EQ, since it has non-linear phase
uploaded the zip again, it should be ok now:
http://bigyo.untergrund.net/buzz/bigyo_eq_v10.zip
Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:39 am
by Evelon
Much appreciated!
Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:34 pm
by magmavander
Thanks for these eq. I used it in still all my works now.
They are stable, they dont eat all my cpu
Merci!!
Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 5:55 pm
by Buzztler
Just wanted to say ... many, many thanks for these awesome eq's Bigyo ...
I tested the 31-band EQ in the effect chain of the bass in my latest track and I think it is really good working, with low cpu consumption and the two sliders on top of the parameter-window are very, very useful ...
Why don't you upload them to the buzzmachines dot com page?
Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 2:31 pm
by Dean
bigup for bigyo!
another great machine for the collection!
Re: Graphic EQ
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 5:25 pm
by bigyo
i made one small change: range parameter is now 0 - 32 dB. i will upload it (and updated ParamEQ) to buzzmachines today