Updated Matilde Tracker

[george]

Thanks for the report. I've found additional issues not addressed in the previous fix.

Download the new build and let me know if clicks persist. The fix should handle all cases of v1.10 project loading.

[thepedal]

Amazing, thanks. Will let you know later.

[thepedal]

Still getting the high amp clicks and pops I'm afraid, along with some erratic other crazy sounds. Let me know if there's any more specific info I can pass over.

[george]

Thanks for the report. I'm confused about the issue. Buzz installs Matilde Tracker2.dll, which doesn't conflict with the latest Matilde Tracker (Matilde Tracker.dll). I can't load Matilde 1.09 on the latest Buzz, and I can't find 1.10 anywhere. Renaming the latest one seems like the best workaround.

I added new fixes, but we're in a bit hit and miss scenario.

[thepedal]

Huge thanks for your time, this might be a total dead end and given that it seems to be fine if you start from scratch OR just leave it on filter mode 2 then that may be how it is...

I've always used the multi-out mtracker as 'Matilde Tracker3.dll' and that's what I've been copying these updates to. Could that be overly confusing matters?

[thepedal]

Hey @george

Your updated, updated version of Matilde *seems* to play better in ReBuzz than in old Buzz. I don't have empirical proof of this but my testing the improved SINC setting in old Buzz has usually had it using a lot more CPU than is really feasible whereas in ReBuzz that doesn't *seem* to be an issue. How much of a task would it be (given we now have absurdly powerful AI coding tools to help us) to create a 64bit version of it? Is your updated source for it available anywhere?

[oskari]

I guess 3 seconds but how would the 64-bit version help?

[thepedal]

I'm thinking some overhead might be reduced by the processes running directly under the ReBuzz main process rather than via the 32bit bridge. Is that naive?

[mcbpete]

The recent versions are called "Matilde Tracker2.dll" (versions 1.7 and up). I wonder if we should stick to this? ... or is it called "Matilde Tracker.dll" in people's Buzz installs?

Output binary in the project was called Matilde Tracker.dll for the 1.10rc build. I kept this name, but I can change it if another name is required.

I think it might be better if the new build is called Matilde Tracker2.dll as the original Matilde Tracker only had one parameter vs Matilde Tracker 2's six parameters (i.e. from version 1.7 and up)



Loading old projects with these latest builds of Matilde Tracker.dll causes all Matilde patterns in that project to be empty - presumably due to this parameter mismatch ( viewtopic.php?p=17903#p17903 )